If people in general are even physically big/tall or things like that in order to be a leader, why in the end would other people agree to have them take from other social/emotional arrangements/situations for themselves or let others do so in their stead? (No offense to anyone. I was trying to get into the theory of this. I'm not trying nor wanting to socially attack anyone. It has to do with my hight.)
Some of Generation X and even Late Boomers seem more short and less likely to be comfortable leading.
I guess all I can say is that cute, athletic females are the short ones and look good when they are young.
I was worried about not having a strong build more than reaching a certain hight if I could, for a time.
People have needs, tho, and some people make sacrifices or take advantages out of the norm lifestyle to get some end.
It surprises me how tall some Generation Z girls are.
I just don't get with me why I was tall at puberty but short thereafter against my will, when we moved from Florida to Louisiana.
I think the norm hight for females is a little taller than me. I heard 5'7" was considered lanky from a source. "Big" people are usually the short ones. I'm glad to be in some middle ground. Maybe, all the sleep I lost in school trying to focus on and complete homework halted my growing but just for awhile.